Scan barcode
retroreader17's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Sexual content, Abandonment, and War
angorarabbit's review against another edition
adventurous
mysterious
reflective
relaxing
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
The style is first person singular, the male protagonist writing for himself about his childhood and early adulthood and the people he was close to. The characters are written in depth and believable and complex. Like his novel The Cat’s Table he seems to understand how children seem to see the world compared to how they recall the same events and people when they are adults.
Mr Ondaatje’s prose is very evocative of time and place. It also reflects on memories and how people are torn between duty and desire. Reading this novel was a joy.
Graphic: Sexual content and Abandonment
Moderate: Animal cruelty, Animal death, Chronic illness, Death, Torture, Violence, Blood, Medical content, Death of parent, Gaslighting, War, and Injury/Injury detail
Minor: Gun violence, Dementia, Car accident, Murder, Pregnancy, and Alcohol
A character has epilepsy, they do have two seizures on page but it is not described how the condition affects their life. There is little diversity as far as ethnicity, orientation or gender. Dog racing is a sub-plot in the beginning of the novel, though no actual greyhounds are killed, drugging and racing are referred to.silene's review against another edition
emotional
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
It’s intriguing but often painfully dull. The narrator is a boring character with an uninteresting voice. He’s also highly unreliable, which is barely acknowledged. So much of the revealed mystery is passively admitted to being what he imagines from the little bit he does know. The big mystery is espionage during and after WWII with the enemies his mother made. Most of it still remains unknown. His mother or Rachel would have been more interesting narrators. It would have helped if he would have been observant and put events in a more reasonable order. Additionally, every romance in this is unhealthy and most are a bit gross. There is a serious age gap issue and infidelity. The premise was so promising, but I was underwhelmed by the entire book. It’s artfully done, but I think he could have done far better.
Moderate: Sexual content
Minor: Adult/minor relationship