Reviews

Muhammad: Prophet of Peace Amid the Clash of Empires by Juan Cole

ay_laluna's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Juan Cole offers an interpretation of the Qur’an and the Islamic tradition that is grounded in the concept of peace and respect for a pluralistic society, both ethnically and religiously. I learned a lot— just know that the book is fairly dense and not necessarily very accessible to folks without a foundational understanding of Middle Eastern history.

I would characterize this as a book that deals primarily with the early history of Islam, and secondarily with the history of the life of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) himself. It’s also important to keep in mind that Juan Cole is a historian, not a theologian, so this should appropriately be understood as a history book. For that reason, I would advise caution when reading reviews that disagree with and discard the author’s thesis on a doctrinal basis— Cole is clear that his is one out of a multitude of interpretations and he warns that it squarely contradicts the positions of both classical and modern exegetes.

falconn's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

A good summary of the Prophet ﷺ 's journey in growing the Muslim community and how he navigated relations with non Muslim communities both in times of peace and war.

The author argues that Prophet ﷺ 's treatment of non Muslims is rooted in a Quran which from promotes a perennialist-like monotheism where Sabians and other people of the book are on the oath of salvation even if they dont accept the Muslim religion.

Asides from that theological assertion, the book is well researched and brings a lot from a myriad Western academics as well as classical Muslim scholarship.

_louw's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative

3.25

This is hard to rate. On one hand, I really appreciated reading a biography of the Prophet (pbuh) in the socio-historical context in which revelation occurred. However, this was a weird book to read - the way the author clearly had beef with later Muslim historians/sources, Qur'an translations being his own but also kind of dodgey/weird? There were a lot of assumptions the author had/pushed up against in terms of Muslim sources but he just seemed to think he /other Western historians were right. 

Overall interesting and useful book but take it with a grain of salt and read it in context of other sources if you are a believer! I'd be interested to hear what non-Muslims thinks of this book honestly bc I'm not sure who I would recommend it to?

maastaar's review against another edition

Go to review page

informative reflective medium-paced

4.0

acikulatbuku's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Well researched book.