Scan barcode
s_zamarripa's review against another edition
4.0
We never seem to free ourselves from our issues of our forefathers.
polanabear's review against another edition
4.0
"the child must adapt to ensure the illusion of love, care, and kindness, but the adult does not need this illusion to survive. They can give up their amnesia and then be in a position to determine their actions with open eyes. Only this path will free them from depression. Both the depressive and the grandiose person completely deny their childhood reality by living as though the availability of the parents can still be salvaged: the grandiose person through the illusion of achievement, and the depressive through their constant fear of losing "love". Neither can accept the truth that this loss or absence of love has already happened on the past, and no effort whatsoever can change this fact."
svanderslice's review against another edition
3.0
A bit of tunnel vision as others have pointed out, but still a game changer. The title is misleading, though,
quartzmaya's review against another edition
emotional
informative
reflective
medium-paced
4.0
“Often a child’s very gifts (his great intensity of feeling, depth of experience, curiosity, intelligence, quickness—and his ability to be critical) will confront his parents with conflicts that they have long sought to keep at bay by means of rules and regulations.”
"A mother cannot truly respect her child as long as she does not realize what deep shame she causes him with an ironic remark, intended only to cover her own uncertainty. Indeed, she cannot be aware of how deeply humiliated, despised, and devalued her child feels, if she herself has never consciously suffered these feelings, and if she tries to fend them off with irony.”
“Even as an older child, she was not allowed to say, or even to think: “I can be sad or happy whenever anything makes me sad or happy; I don’t have to look cheerful for someone else, and I don’t have to suppress my distress or anxiety to fit other people’s needs. I can be angry and no one will die or get a headache because of it. I can rage when you hurt me, without losing you.”
-----
Alice Miller’s The Drama of the Gifted Child is a profound exploration of childhood trauma, repressed emotions, and the lifelong psychological patterns that result from early experiences of conditional love. Miller argues that many people carry an unfulfilled emotional burden from childhood— one in which their value was determined by their ability to meet parental expectations rather than by their intrinsic selves. Through her examination of the “gifted child,” she does not mean those with high academic or artistic talent, but rather those who, from a young age, developed an acute sensitivity to their caregivers’ needs, often at the cost of their own emotional well-being.
One of Miller’s central arguments is that children who learn to suppress their true feelings in order to gain parental approval often grow into adults who are deeply disconnected from their authentic selves. She examines how these individuals oscillate between grandiosity and depression—grandiosity serving as a defense mechanism against the unbearable weight of childhood rejection, and depression surfacing when that defense inevitably collapses. As she poignantly writes, “Many people suffer all their lives from this oppressive feeling of guilt, the sense of not having lived up to their parents' expectations. This feeling is stronger than any intellectual insight they might have, that it is not a child's task or duty to satisfy his parents’ needs.” This passage encapsulates the book’s central thesis: that the wounds inflicted in childhood are deeply embedded and persist despite any rational understanding of their origins.
Miller’s approach is both deeply compassionate and unflinchingly direct. She does not allow for easy resolutions or quick fixes but instead advocates for a process of self-exploration and emotional honesty that can be painful yet necessary for healing. She challenges readers to confront their past without minimizing or justifying their parents’ behavior, recognizing that true emotional freedom comes only from acknowledging the pain that has been suppressed. This is captured in one of her most striking passages: “The true opposite of depression is neither gaiety nor absence of pain, but vitality—the freedom to experience spontaneous feelings.” It is in this unfiltered emotional engagement with life that Miller sees the possibility of genuine healing.
One of the book’s most thought-provoking insights is its examination of how unresolved childhood wounds manifest in parenting. Miller argues that unless parents consciously process their own emotional history, they are likely to repeat the same damaging patterns with their own children. She illustrates how a parent’s inability to tolerate their own emotions —shame, fear, or anger— leads to an unconscious suppression of their child’s emotional world. “What is unconscious cannot be abolished by proclamation or prohibition. One can, however, develop sensitivity toward recognizing it and begin to experience it consciously, and thus eventually gain control over it,” she writes, emphasizing that awareness is the first step toward breaking the cycle of emotional neglect.
Reading this book led me to deeply reflect on how parenting my children has dredged up my own childhood struggles. I have realized how much I struggle to handle their expressions of negative emotion, often finding myself wanting to disengage or flee at any sign of anger or sadness. This book helped me draw a line between my childhood struggles to feel loved or accepted as myself, and my current discomforts and general struggle to process or handle rejection and discomfort in a healthy way. Recognizing this pattern has been (much as Miller's patients also describe their experiences in the book) painful but also liberating, as I now see the opportunity to do better. I am grateful to experience this insight and I am working to create an environment where my children feel safe expressing all of their emotions, sparing them from the struggles I have faced in understanding and managing my own feelings.
Stylistically, Miller’s writing is both accessible and deeply introspective. She does not overburden the reader with dense psychological jargon but instead presents her ideas with clarity and emotional resonance. At times, the book’s brevity leaves certain concepts underdeveloped, and I wish that there had been a more structured framework for healing beyond the general call for self-awareness and therapy. However, what the book lacks in prescriptive guidance, it more than compensates for in its ability to provoke self-reflection and challenge long-held assumptions about childhood and identity.
While Miller’s perspective is rooted in psychoanalytic thought, her insights transcend any specific school of psychology. The Drama of the Gifted Child is ultimately a call for emotional authenticity, for the courage to acknowledge the pain of the past in order to reclaim the true self. For those willing to engage with its challenging but rewarding ideas, the book offers not just understanding but the possibility of profound personal transformation.
"A mother cannot truly respect her child as long as she does not realize what deep shame she causes him with an ironic remark, intended only to cover her own uncertainty. Indeed, she cannot be aware of how deeply humiliated, despised, and devalued her child feels, if she herself has never consciously suffered these feelings, and if she tries to fend them off with irony.”
“Even as an older child, she was not allowed to say, or even to think: “I can be sad or happy whenever anything makes me sad or happy; I don’t have to look cheerful for someone else, and I don’t have to suppress my distress or anxiety to fit other people’s needs. I can be angry and no one will die or get a headache because of it. I can rage when you hurt me, without losing you.”
-----
Alice Miller’s The Drama of the Gifted Child is a profound exploration of childhood trauma, repressed emotions, and the lifelong psychological patterns that result from early experiences of conditional love. Miller argues that many people carry an unfulfilled emotional burden from childhood— one in which their value was determined by their ability to meet parental expectations rather than by their intrinsic selves. Through her examination of the “gifted child,” she does not mean those with high academic or artistic talent, but rather those who, from a young age, developed an acute sensitivity to their caregivers’ needs, often at the cost of their own emotional well-being.
One of Miller’s central arguments is that children who learn to suppress their true feelings in order to gain parental approval often grow into adults who are deeply disconnected from their authentic selves. She examines how these individuals oscillate between grandiosity and depression—grandiosity serving as a defense mechanism against the unbearable weight of childhood rejection, and depression surfacing when that defense inevitably collapses. As she poignantly writes, “Many people suffer all their lives from this oppressive feeling of guilt, the sense of not having lived up to their parents' expectations. This feeling is stronger than any intellectual insight they might have, that it is not a child's task or duty to satisfy his parents’ needs.” This passage encapsulates the book’s central thesis: that the wounds inflicted in childhood are deeply embedded and persist despite any rational understanding of their origins.
Miller’s approach is both deeply compassionate and unflinchingly direct. She does not allow for easy resolutions or quick fixes but instead advocates for a process of self-exploration and emotional honesty that can be painful yet necessary for healing. She challenges readers to confront their past without minimizing or justifying their parents’ behavior, recognizing that true emotional freedom comes only from acknowledging the pain that has been suppressed. This is captured in one of her most striking passages: “The true opposite of depression is neither gaiety nor absence of pain, but vitality—the freedom to experience spontaneous feelings.” It is in this unfiltered emotional engagement with life that Miller sees the possibility of genuine healing.
One of the book’s most thought-provoking insights is its examination of how unresolved childhood wounds manifest in parenting. Miller argues that unless parents consciously process their own emotional history, they are likely to repeat the same damaging patterns with their own children. She illustrates how a parent’s inability to tolerate their own emotions —shame, fear, or anger— leads to an unconscious suppression of their child’s emotional world. “What is unconscious cannot be abolished by proclamation or prohibition. One can, however, develop sensitivity toward recognizing it and begin to experience it consciously, and thus eventually gain control over it,” she writes, emphasizing that awareness is the first step toward breaking the cycle of emotional neglect.
Reading this book led me to deeply reflect on how parenting my children has dredged up my own childhood struggles. I have realized how much I struggle to handle their expressions of negative emotion, often finding myself wanting to disengage or flee at any sign of anger or sadness. This book helped me draw a line between my childhood struggles to feel loved or accepted as myself, and my current discomforts and general struggle to process or handle rejection and discomfort in a healthy way. Recognizing this pattern has been (much as Miller's patients also describe their experiences in the book) painful but also liberating, as I now see the opportunity to do better. I am grateful to experience this insight and I am working to create an environment where my children feel safe expressing all of their emotions, sparing them from the struggles I have faced in understanding and managing my own feelings.
Stylistically, Miller’s writing is both accessible and deeply introspective. She does not overburden the reader with dense psychological jargon but instead presents her ideas with clarity and emotional resonance. At times, the book’s brevity leaves certain concepts underdeveloped, and I wish that there had been a more structured framework for healing beyond the general call for self-awareness and therapy. However, what the book lacks in prescriptive guidance, it more than compensates for in its ability to provoke self-reflection and challenge long-held assumptions about childhood and identity.
While Miller’s perspective is rooted in psychoanalytic thought, her insights transcend any specific school of psychology. The Drama of the Gifted Child is ultimately a call for emotional authenticity, for the courage to acknowledge the pain of the past in order to reclaim the true self. For those willing to engage with its challenging but rewarding ideas, the book offers not just understanding but the possibility of profound personal transformation.
erinnbatykefer's review against another edition
4.0
Profound in its insights into repressed emotions from childhood and how they metastasize into the dysfunction of adulthood. It's a short book-- just ~120 pages-- but the examples feel highly relevant to today's narcissistic bent toward nationalism, cruelty, and anti-human agendas, explaining all as a function of self-hatred and denial of childhood hurts in an effort to protect abusive (in every possible iteration) parents.
I was particularly interested in the connections Miller draws between physical reactions and repressed emotion (related: [b:The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma|18693771|The Body Keeps the Score Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma|Bessel van der Kolk|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1594559067l/18693771._SY75_.jpg|26542319],), the liberty of understanding and owning what *really* happened to you and how it can result in physical healing in addition to psychic. One of the most profound passages notes that contempt for others dissolves once you face your repressed emotions and identify where they came from. Miller identifies contempt as a method used to avoid engaging with the self and to protect your abusers by shifting your legitimate hatred to illegitimate scapegoats and notes that this compulsion falls away utterly once you have a true sense of your feelings and where they belong.
I was particularly interested in the connections Miller draws between physical reactions and repressed emotion (related: [b:The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma|18693771|The Body Keeps the Score Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma|Bessel van der Kolk|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1594559067l/18693771._SY75_.jpg|26542319],), the liberty of understanding and owning what *really* happened to you and how it can result in physical healing in addition to psychic. One of the most profound passages notes that contempt for others dissolves once you face your repressed emotions and identify where they came from. Miller identifies contempt as a method used to avoid engaging with the self and to protect your abusers by shifting your legitimate hatred to illegitimate scapegoats and notes that this compulsion falls away utterly once you have a true sense of your feelings and where they belong.
domidm's review against another edition
5.0
Mensen komen waarschijnlijk niet toevallig bij een boek als dit uit maar kijk, ik zag het toevallig staan bij de nieuwe aanwinsten van de bib en voelde me (vermoedelijk niet toevallig) aangesproken. Interessante lectuur. Ik vermoed dat je niet alle problemen van de wereld kan uitleggen a.d.h.v. iemands vroege jeugd, maar deze inzichten zijn alleszins waardevol. (En ze geven hoop dat alles kan goedkomen voor wie het werk doet om hun emoties te voélen i.p.v. ze te ontlopen.)
annabellevirginia's review against another edition
3.0
An interesting read, though I did not really learn anything I haven't heard before! I think a book like this benefits from anecdotes, because it can be hard to truly conceptualize & understand some of the language of this topic. This is something this book does well! Overall, I give 3 stars.
less_noise's review against another edition
5.0
In order to become whole we must try, in a long process, to discover our own personal truth, a truth that may cause pain before giving us a new sphere of freedom. If we choose instead to content ourselves with intellectual “wisdom,” we will remain in the sphere of illusion and self-deception.
*
The mother gazes at the baby in her arms, and the baby gazes at his mother’s face and finds himself therein…provided that the mother is really looking at the unique, small, helpless being and not projecting her own expectations, fears, and plans for the child. In that case, the child would find not himself in his mother’s face, but rather the mother’s own projections. This child would remain without a mirror, and for the rest of his life would be seeking this mirror in vain.
*
Two extreme forms, of which I consider one to be the reverse of the other—grandiosity and depression. Behind manifest grandiosity there constantly lurks depression, and behind a depressive mood there often hides an unconscious (or conscious but split off) sense of a tragic history. In fact, grandiosity is the defense against depression, and depression is the defense against the deep pain over the loss of the self that results from denial.
*
There are many children who have not been free, right from the beginning, to experience the very simplest of feelings, such as discontent, anger, rage, pain, even hunger—and, of course, enjoyment of their own bodies.
*
This ability to grieve—that is, to give up the illusion of his “happy” childhood, to feel and recognize the full extent of the hurt he has endured—can restore the depressive’s vitality and creativity and free the grandiose person from the exertions of and dependence on his Sisyphean task.
*
The mother gazes at the baby in her arms, and the baby gazes at his mother’s face and finds himself therein…provided that the mother is really looking at the unique, small, helpless being and not projecting her own expectations, fears, and plans for the child. In that case, the child would find not himself in his mother’s face, but rather the mother’s own projections. This child would remain without a mirror, and for the rest of his life would be seeking this mirror in vain.
*
Two extreme forms, of which I consider one to be the reverse of the other—grandiosity and depression. Behind manifest grandiosity there constantly lurks depression, and behind a depressive mood there often hides an unconscious (or conscious but split off) sense of a tragic history. In fact, grandiosity is the defense against depression, and depression is the defense against the deep pain over the loss of the self that results from denial.
*
There are many children who have not been free, right from the beginning, to experience the very simplest of feelings, such as discontent, anger, rage, pain, even hunger—and, of course, enjoyment of their own bodies.
*
This ability to grieve—that is, to give up the illusion of his “happy” childhood, to feel and recognize the full extent of the hurt he has endured—can restore the depressive’s vitality and creativity and free the grandiose person from the exertions of and dependence on his Sisyphean task.
anikareads95's review against another edition
challenging
emotional
inspiring
reflective
fast-paced
4.0