A solid overview of these four views. My only point of contention is that the editor really tips his hat to what he thinks is the right view: he’s an evangelical through and through and his conclusion makes that evident. That is, he doesn’t approach the other views with the amount of intellectual humility and impartiality one would expect from the editor (who’s job is general to conclude by moving towards integrating all the views, rather than by making his personal opinion incredibly obvious). Overall a thought provoking and helpful read.

Oppy's writing for Naturalism is worth reading this book. Other that that, I feel that you cannot conclude much from it, yet you might learn about different views within Philosophy and Christianity intersecting.

Deus Vult,
Gottfried