Agreeing with the central postulation tends to help but even with this particular barrier overcome I never really enjoyed reading this book. Whilst it does have strong, generally well argued points for the case of atheism, Dawkins' personality is such that the book is almost unreadable in places. It's hard to put a finger on what exactly the problem is but I think it may be that he tries to speak to too many people. Yes, it is important that everyone knows and understands the dangers of religion, but I don't think one book can be used to do this.