Scan barcode
A review by perthalus
Dracula by Bram Stoker
adventurous
dark
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.25
I originally read this in anticipation for Robert Eggers’ Nosferatu, watching both the previous 20s and 70s versions of Nosferatu as well, and after seeing all three versions I’ve found myself appreciating Bram Stoker’s Dracula more than I initially did. It’s dense descriptions and poorly aged gender roles do make it a difficult read at times, but at its core the dense descriptions actually add to the thick world-building that makes Dracula such an enthralling, mystical read.
It’s cast of characters are so close and intertwined in the face of villainy, and it’s villain has stood the test of time for a reason. Whether he’s played by Gary Oldman, Bela Legosi, or Bill Skårsgard, he’s always incredibly effective in his presence, power, and the stakes he raises. The use of horror through his otherworldly effects in the world is one of the standout elements of the book, the use of diaries and news stories creates a fragmented, anecdotal depiction of the Count and his abilities. Particularly, his effect on Lucy and the whole section of her as a vampire, haunting children in the area was especially creepy as Dracula’s power often extend beyond himself.
There’s just so much to love about it, and it’s so ripe for adaption due to the different elements and sections or characters of the book that can be swapped out, combined, or even subverted due to the age of the story. Quincey is rarely used in adaptations as well as Lucy’s section as a vampire, often times Nina is given Lucy’s role, and more. All these specific little details make the book worth reading for the complete experience, as after over 100 years, Bram Stoker’s book is still the definitive version of itself. As challenging as it was, it’s more than worth getting through the lighter chapters of little consequence and even finding some enjoyment in them (don’t skip chapters!) because the story wraps up in such a satisfying way.
It’s a wholesome story of love and friendship as much as it is a horrifying story about an invasive force of evil. It has solidified Van Helsing as one of my favourite characters in literature and only strengthened my love for Dracula as a villain. No amount of monologues by thick northern accents could ruin what makes this book such a classic.
It’s cast of characters are so close and intertwined in the face of villainy, and it’s villain has stood the test of time for a reason. Whether he’s played by Gary Oldman, Bela Legosi, or Bill Skårsgard, he’s always incredibly effective in his presence, power, and the stakes he raises. The use of horror through his otherworldly effects in the world is one of the standout elements of the book, the use of diaries and news stories creates a fragmented, anecdotal depiction of the Count and his abilities. Particularly, his effect on Lucy and the whole section of her as a vampire, haunting children in the area was especially creepy as Dracula’s power often extend beyond himself.
There’s just so much to love about it, and it’s so ripe for adaption due to the different elements and sections or characters of the book that can be swapped out, combined, or even subverted due to the age of the story. Quincey is rarely used in adaptations as well as Lucy’s section as a vampire, often times Nina is given Lucy’s role, and more. All these specific little details make the book worth reading for the complete experience, as after over 100 years, Bram Stoker’s book is still the definitive version of itself. As challenging as it was, it’s more than worth getting through the lighter chapters of little consequence and even finding some enjoyment in them (don’t skip chapters!) because the story wraps up in such a satisfying way.
It’s a wholesome story of love and friendship as much as it is a horrifying story about an invasive force of evil. It has solidified Van Helsing as one of my favourite characters in literature and only strengthened my love for Dracula as a villain. No amount of monologues by thick northern accents could ruin what makes this book such a classic.
Graphic: Chronic illness, Death, Terminal illness, Blood, and Medical content
Moderate: Animal death, Body horror, Gore, Misogyny, Sexism, Violence, and Death of parent
Minor: Xenophobia