A review by geoffdgeorge
Burning Down the House: Newt Gingrich, the Fall of a Speaker, and the Rise of the New Republican Party by Julian E. Zelizer

Did not finish book. Stopped at 17%.
Trying to be better about stopping books in 2025. What I got through of this one wasn't bad; I just wasn't interested in reading tons more about Newt Gingrich, even if the book wasn't looking at him through rose-colored glasses. My takeaway from the portion I did read is that though I'm likely to disagree with Gingrich on basically every issue, I can't deny he was an absolute bulldog in the House of Representatives once he got there. He put Democrats on a full-court press after seeing how entrenched they were. Consider the following two passages:

In March 1982, Gingrich wrote a letter to all of his fellow Republicans urging them to develop a better, more coordinated message to use in front of the media. ... After reviewing twelve Sunday television interview shows, Gingrich came away impressed by how much attention congressional Democrats devoted to perfecting and repeating their message. Republicans were far less polished, Gingrich thought. "A political party which focuses on the management and allocation of campaign resources, and neglects political strategy, is a party that loses," Gingrich warned. "Two minutes on the evening news is watched by more people, believed by more of them, and, politically has a greater multiplier effect than paid political advertising." Gingrich implored House Republicans to pay more attention to their media appearances. "Republicans tend to have blurred and unfocused opening statements while Democrats tend to focus effectively and persuasively."

and:

It all came down to this: for Republicans to dislodge House Democrats from power, they would have to be ruthless. Democrats didn't play fair, Gingrich believed. He said that incumbents rigged elections through gerrymandering and campaign money; they relied on arcane procedures, such as imposing rules that prevented floor amendments to bills, that disempowered the minority party; and they solidified their public support through corrupt pork-barrel spending and favors for business leaders in their districts. "There's a sense that this (the Capitol) is a neighborhood designed to secure congressmen's feelings. That's very, very dangerous," according to the Georgian. If the GOP adhered to the old rules of politics by being civil and bipartisan, it would simply allow the Democrats to keep winning.

These are descriptions of the political landscape in the late 1970s, but switch the words "Democrats" and "Republicans," and it's basically a description of where things are at now. Republicans are largely dug in and complacent, and the Democrats are in desperate need of some of Gingrich's bulldoggery.

It feels like not enough work is being done to put GOP representatives on the back foot in their own districts. It should not be hard, given all they're doing (or not doing, as the case may be), to embarrass them in front of their constituencies. It should not be hard to show people, at the local level, "here are the foolish things your member of Congress is doing, and here's what they're not doing for you while they act like fools."

I don't know. I'll stop here, lest this become a rant. I just think it's time for Republicans to face a full-court press, and I'm not seeing it right now.