Scan barcode
ameliaadrianna's review against another edition
4.0
I actually really enjoyed this book. The balance of romance, science, history and politics was interesting and worked well. The way that the lifetimes were set up were mysterious and very sci-fy like and it really gave the story a nice edge to it. I will definitely be picking up the next book when it's released.
sue_loves_to_read's review against another edition
2.0
Katherine and Matthew are destined to be born again and again, century after century. Each time, their presence changes history for the better, and each time, they fall hopelessly in love, only to be tragically separated.
Spanning the Crimean War, the Siege of Carlisle and the near-future of 2019 and 2039 they find themselves sacrificing their lives to save the world. But why do they keep coming back? What else must they achieve before they can be left to live and love in peace?
Maybe the next together will be different...
A bit of a disjointed hotchpotch of a story. It flicked from one 'life' to another never giving you much chance of getting involved plus, if you're reading on a kindle, it's difficult to decipher the additional documents and after a few tries I just gave up as I didn't think they added much to the storyline. I won't be bothering with the sequel.
Spanning the Crimean War, the Siege of Carlisle and the near-future of 2019 and 2039 they find themselves sacrificing their lives to save the world. But why do they keep coming back? What else must they achieve before they can be left to live and love in peace?
Maybe the next together will be different...
A bit of a disjointed hotchpotch of a story. It flicked from one 'life' to another never giving you much chance of getting involved plus, if you're reading on a kindle, it's difficult to decipher the additional documents and after a few tries I just gave up as I didn't think they added much to the storyline. I won't be bothering with the sequel.
moonsai's review against another edition
1.0
Warum ist sie in einer Zeitlinie 17 und er 22?
Ich bin etwas verwirrt, weil es 4 Zeitlinien gibt, also habe ich vielleicht etwas verpasst. Auch der Schreibstil ist manchmal fragwürdig.
Zeitreisen, Star Crossed Lovers und Mixed Media sind einige meiner Lieblingsthemen und sie sind alle in einem Buch.
Es ist nichts falsch mit dem Buch aber ich hänge nicht wirklich an den Charakteren. Die waren in Lebensgefahr und es hat mich echt nicht gekümmert. Und ich musste ein Stern für das Ende abziehen. Warum ist das Ende so offen ? Auch wenn es eine duology ist muss man eine paar Fragen beantworten damit es ein befriedigende Ende hat.
Ich bin etwas verwirrt, weil es 4 Zeitlinien gibt, also habe ich vielleicht etwas verpasst. Auch der Schreibstil ist manchmal fragwürdig.
Zeitreisen, Star Crossed Lovers und Mixed Media sind einige meiner Lieblingsthemen und sie sind alle in einem Buch.
Es ist nichts falsch mit dem Buch aber ich hänge nicht wirklich an den Charakteren. Die waren in Lebensgefahr und es hat mich echt nicht gekümmert. Und ich musste ein Stern für das Ende abziehen. Warum ist das Ende so offen ? Auch wenn es eine duology ist muss man eine paar Fragen beantworten damit es ein befriedigende Ende hat.
rachaelreadsx's review against another edition
5.0
HOLY SHIT i am in love. This is now one of my favourite books of all time.
seprielipp's review against another edition
1.0
A mash of Outlander, My Name is Memory, and Time Traveller’s Wife, though not nearly as engaging or interesting. I kept reading because I wanted to know the objective, and the brief mention towards the end was unsatisfying. No purpose or why is ever included which made me feel like I had wasted my time reading this book.
bewilderness's review against another edition
2.0
(Disclaimer: I won this book in a Goodreads giveaway)
*sigh*
This book was not what I was hoping it would be. Started it with high hopes and finished it with high irritation. Not sure where to start. The whole thing was just so disappointing.
Ok, well let's start with the bits I liked:
Er...some of it was amusing? Although the fact that I kept being told how amusing everything was kind of detracted from that. If your writing is witty it should speak for itself without having to be told 'isn't this funny?' And 'aren't these characters cool?'. A lot of this book is the reader being told they are reading witty banter. The number of times the characters found each other hilarious was kind of grating.
It started off ok? The first few chapters I was kind of intrigued. They raise enough interesting questions to keep you reading. HOWEVER, the questions I found interesting were never answered. Questions such as:
- Who or what is monitoring these people?
- How are they monitoring these people?
- Why these people?
- Is the objective to save the world or just have a baby? Because many times when they are putting themselves in danger the 'monitors' are concerned about them meeting their objective. Even if they are performing actions that will help save the day.
- How exactly would the monitors intervene if they could ever be bothered? We see one botched transfer which is then ruled out for obvious reasons but no further intervention.
- Are the monitors viewing the action from inside the timeline or out of it? Because if it's from outside then surely they should know what is about to happen? And if it's inside then how were they able to reach into another timeline and transfer a Matthew back to the past. What are the rules of this time travel?
And so on. None of this is explained. I understand there is to be a sequel but so few of my questions were answered that I'm not sure if I care.
Also, I hate being wilfully deceived as a reader. This happened on two occasions. Once to manufacture a contrived mistrust between Katherine and Matthew when he blatantly says some statements to make him seem like a Jacobite sympathiser and then when she outright asks him if he supports the rebels he panics and doesn't answer. What is the purpose of this when it is later made clear that he supports the English. Why was he being deliberately cryptic. And then he has the gall to be annoyed that Katherine doesn't trust him. This feels like a contrivance to deliberately and understandably make Katherine and the reader suspect him of being a rebel.
The second time is when Matthew dies and is replaced by a future Matthew. Future Matthew clearly states that future Katherine was killed in an attack by a rocket presumably to make us concerned over the future of Katherine in that timeline. He later says she was shot in an event that for the reader has already happened and which she has already survived so her life was never really in danger.
This. Is. Annoying.
I don't mind books being a little cryptic and trying to trick you by clever wording but outright lying is not on.
Similarly, what is the meaning of 'I've just remembered Clove'? That better be explained in a later book because you cannot tell me he is 'remembering' his future daughter because that would make me angry.
Also, 'Clove' as a name in general.
Also where are all the secondary characters? This is very much the Katherine and Matthew show. There are a few barely important secondary characters but the vast majority of the book is about how much Matthew and Katherine love each other. It gets old. There is not one single fully fleshed out secondary character. In fact Matt and Katherine are barely fleshed out as it is. Katherine is the 'funny' one and Matthew is the...actually I don't know what Matthew is. The shy one? Because he blushes a lot? Or maybe he's just 'the one that loves Katherine' because that seems to be his only defining characteristic.
Also, I can tolerate a certain amount of anachronism but I did not buy into any of the past timelines. The characters didn't speak or act like they were from that era. I know it seems silly in today's society, but I really think societal conventions of the time should definitely have given Katherine pause for thought before embarking on any sort of friendship with a servant. Which nobody else seems to notice or care about btw. There should DEFINITELY have been some gossip or scandal surrounding their relationship but this is never remotely problematic in the book. I also really don't buy the dressing as a boy thing. Apparently all it takes is wearing boys clothes and putting your hair up. She can even wear 'revealing' trousers without anyone noticing. People in olden times were completely unobservant apparently.
And don't get me started on the massively underdeveloped future timeline, which is indistinguishable from modern times except for there being some kind of English/Europe conflict.
Then there's the fact that their instalove relationship is way too cloying. It's all they ever talk about. And we're never really shown them falling in love. They love each other because they are supposed to. There is no real relationship development except for contrived and swiftly overcome obstacles. They are just in love and always have been.
This book made me want to re-read Cloud Atlas. Which is an incredibly well written book about reincarnations in different timelines. This reminds me of that but, sadly, infinitely more disappointing.
The only reason this isn't a one star review is because it might work as a story if my questions are answered in the next book. Although I'm still undecided if I'll bother reading it.
*sigh*
This book was not what I was hoping it would be. Started it with high hopes and finished it with high irritation. Not sure where to start. The whole thing was just so disappointing.
Ok, well let's start with the bits I liked:
Er...some of it was amusing? Although the fact that I kept being told how amusing everything was kind of detracted from that. If your writing is witty it should speak for itself without having to be told 'isn't this funny?' And 'aren't these characters cool?'. A lot of this book is the reader being told they are reading witty banter. The number of times the characters found each other hilarious was kind of grating.
It started off ok? The first few chapters I was kind of intrigued. They raise enough interesting questions to keep you reading. HOWEVER, the questions I found interesting were never answered. Questions such as:
- Who or what is monitoring these people?
- How are they monitoring these people?
- Why these people?
- Is the objective to save the world or just have a baby? Because many times when they are putting themselves in danger the 'monitors' are concerned about them meeting their objective. Even if they are performing actions that will help save the day.
- How exactly would the monitors intervene if they could ever be bothered? We see one botched transfer which is then ruled out for obvious reasons but no further intervention.
- Are the monitors viewing the action from inside the timeline or out of it? Because if it's from outside then surely they should know what is about to happen? And if it's inside then how were they able to reach into another timeline and transfer a Matthew back to the past. What are the rules of this time travel?
And so on. None of this is explained. I understand there is to be a sequel but so few of my questions were answered that I'm not sure if I care.
Also, I hate being wilfully deceived as a reader. This happened on two occasions. Once to manufacture a contrived mistrust between Katherine and Matthew when he blatantly says some statements to make him seem like a Jacobite sympathiser and then when she outright asks him if he supports the rebels he panics and doesn't answer. What is the purpose of this when it is later made clear that he supports the English. Why was he being deliberately cryptic. And then he has the gall to be annoyed that Katherine doesn't trust him. This feels like a contrivance to deliberately and understandably make Katherine and the reader suspect him of being a rebel.
The second time is when Matthew dies and is replaced by a future Matthew. Future Matthew clearly states that future Katherine was killed in an attack by a rocket presumably to make us concerned over the future of Katherine in that timeline. He later says she was shot in an event that for the reader has already happened and which she has already survived so her life was never really in danger.
This. Is. Annoying.
I don't mind books being a little cryptic and trying to trick you by clever wording but outright lying is not on.
Similarly, what is the meaning of 'I've just remembered Clove'? That better be explained in a later book because you cannot tell me he is 'remembering' his future daughter because that would make me angry.
Also, 'Clove' as a name in general.
Also where are all the secondary characters? This is very much the Katherine and Matthew show. There are a few barely important secondary characters but the vast majority of the book is about how much Matthew and Katherine love each other. It gets old. There is not one single fully fleshed out secondary character. In fact Matt and Katherine are barely fleshed out as it is. Katherine is the 'funny' one and Matthew is the...actually I don't know what Matthew is. The shy one? Because he blushes a lot? Or maybe he's just 'the one that loves Katherine' because that seems to be his only defining characteristic.
Also, I can tolerate a certain amount of anachronism but I did not buy into any of the past timelines. The characters didn't speak or act like they were from that era. I know it seems silly in today's society, but I really think societal conventions of the time should definitely have given Katherine pause for thought before embarking on any sort of friendship with a servant. Which nobody else seems to notice or care about btw. There should DEFINITELY have been some gossip or scandal surrounding their relationship but this is never remotely problematic in the book. I also really don't buy the dressing as a boy thing. Apparently all it takes is wearing boys clothes and putting your hair up. She can even wear 'revealing' trousers without anyone noticing. People in olden times were completely unobservant apparently.
And don't get me started on the massively underdeveloped future timeline, which is indistinguishable from modern times except for there being some kind of English/Europe conflict.
Then there's the fact that their instalove relationship is way too cloying. It's all they ever talk about. And we're never really shown them falling in love. They love each other because they are supposed to. There is no real relationship development except for contrived and swiftly overcome obstacles. They are just in love and always have been.
This book made me want to re-read Cloud Atlas. Which is an incredibly well written book about reincarnations in different timelines. This reminds me of that but, sadly, infinitely more disappointing.
The only reason this isn't a one star review is because it might work as a story if my questions are answered in the next book. Although I'm still undecided if I'll bother reading it.
alice2410's review against another edition
5.0
This book is intelligent, witty, romantic, quirky and so intriguing. Katherine and Matthew (in all eras) are brilliant characters, who I loved almost instantly. It is basically my ideal book and my only complaint is that it ended. Thank goodness there's a sequel!
kiwikathleen's review against another edition
4.0
I've written on other reviews that I'm not into romance novels, so really you'd think I wouldn't have enjoyed this. However, though the whole of this book revolves around Katherine and Matthew falling in love, this book tells such an amazing story that I was glued to the pages.
Fabulous premise, fabulously executed.
Fabulous premise, fabulously executed.
silverfush's review against another edition
3.0
Strange book, that never lived up to what I thought it would be. Enjoyed reading it neverless although I did get confused at times where I was in the storyline. (I don't recall the Bletchley park section?)
Apparently this is part of a series, not sure I will read the rest.
Apparently this is part of a series, not sure I will read the rest.